Complaints against Western Cape High Court Judge Gayaat Salie-Hlophe have been dismissed by the Judicial Conduct Committee.

  • Complaints against Judge Gayaat Salie-Hlophe have been dismissed.
  • According to the Judicial Conduct Committee, there was not enough evidence to warrant a formal investigation by a tribunal.
  • It was alleged that Salie-Hlophe had been improperly involved in the management of the Western Cape division, enjoyed preferential treatment and made unwarranted complaints against her colleagues.

Complaints against Western Cape Judge President John Hlophe’s wife, Judge Gayaat Salie-Hlophe, have been dismissed after the Judicial Conduct Committee (JCC) found that there was not enough evidence to warrant a formal investigation by a tribunal.
FRIDAY BRIEFING: Karyn Maughan | How the WC Judge President has faced 10 major scandals, without any sanction
Deputy Judge President (DJP) Patricia Goliath lodged the complaints against Salie-Hlophe.
“In relation to Judge Salie-Hlophe, the allegations were that she had assumed ‘enormous power’ in the division, resulting in some of the judges being afraid of her and being disinclined to raise openly any issues relating to her; that she was (improperly) participating in the management of the court, the allocation of cases and appointment of acting judges; that she chose which judges she would sit with on appeals, and that her (unwarranted) complaints about certain judges to the JP (judge president) had resulted in strained relationships between the JP and the judges concerned and the assault referred to in the preceding paragraph,” the JCC’s Judge Nambitha Dambuza said.
The assault stems from allegations that Hlophe assaulted his colleague, Judge Mushtak Parker.
Goliath also alleged that other judges claimed Salie-Hlophe was allocated less Friday appeals compared to them, and that Salie-Hlophe complained about her colleagues on the Bench.
According to the JCC, these were some of the instances in which Goliath alleged Salie-Hlophe complained to the JP about her colleagues:

  • She complained that Judge André le Grange refused to allocate a specifically requested parking bay to her.
  • She complained that Judge Pat Gamble excluded her from a conversation during lunch.
  • She complained about Judge Derek Wille’s alleged “inappropriate” conduct towards her, which resulted in successive circuit court allocations as punishment.

She would not disclose which judges complained, so the JCC could not follow up.
However, the JCC found that apart from an assault matter, the allegations about Salie-Hlophe’s complaints and the negative effect thereof, hit a blank wall.
“The fundamental problems therewith were the absence of evidence regarding the content of the report and the fact that the implicated judges either did not recall the incidents to which the alleged complaints related, or were not keen on participating in these proceedings,”  the JCC said.
When the JCC contacted the judges, many could not remember the incidents.

  • Judge Gamble could not recall the incident where he allegedly excluded Salie-Hlophe from a conversation.
  • Judge Wille did not want to respond to the allegations in view of his longstanding friendship with the judge president.
  • Judge Le Grange confirmed that his relationship with Hlophe had deteriorated but could not recall an issue about a parking bay.

“In the end, the only conclusion I can make in this regard is that the relationship between the JP and some of the judges is strained. There may be rumblings of dissatisfaction about aspects of management of the division. There may also be an environment of fear and apprehension among the judges of the division or some of them,” Dambuza found.
READ | Judicial Conduct Committee recommends a tribunal investigate complaints against Western Cape judge
“But I am unable to find that these emanate from misconduct on the part of Judge Salie-Hlophe. And, from the evidence given by the judges that were allegedly the victims of Judge Salie Hlophe’s conduct, I am not persuaded that a formal (oral) hearing would yield more concrete evidence and contribute to the determination of the merits of the DJP’s complaint against Judge Salie-Hlophe.”
The JCC also found that even if it were true that Judge Salie-Hlophe received preferential treatment, her enjoyment thereof could not constitute misconduct on her part.
The committee did, however, recommend that a tribunal investigate allegations made about Goliath in media statements, together with the allegations that she attempted to influence Salie-Hlophe to lay false criminal charges against Hlophe, encouraged Salie-Hlophe to divorce Hlophe, and referred to Hlophe as an “old black man”.
“If indeed the DJP made the alleged statements, particularly the act of urging Judge Salie-Hlophe to lay false criminal charges against the JP, it seems to me that that would prima facie be impeachable gross misconduct.
“Similarly, if Judge Salie-Hlophe falsely accused the DJP of having said these things, [t]hat too would be impeachable gross misconduct. These aspects of the complaint therefore fall to be investigated by a tribunal,” Dambuza said.
Did you know you can comment on this article? Subscribe to News24 and add your voice to the conversation.